Scientifically studying sex should be a top priority for our society.
In both ends of the spectrum, but particularly in radical feminists, theories are influenced by ideologies and politics, hurting society at large.
Recently, a feminist(president of a feminist university group) told me males were incomplete females(XY would be an incomplete version of XX) and, for that reason, they should have their instincts and behaviour suppressed.
You know, comments like this would be a lot more credible if they had some sort of evidence to go along with them besides "I had this friend..." or "I got told one time by an x/y/z...".
"The male is a biological accident: the Y (male) gene is an incomplete X (female) gene, that is, it has an incomplete set of chromosomes. In other words, the male is an incomplete female, a walking abortion, aborted at the gene stage. To be male is to be deficient, emotionally limited; maleness is a deficiency disease and males are emotional cripples."
That sounds quite radical. Do you happen to have a link to this article? If so I would be interested in writing the board of trustees for that institution.
It's not too hard to find some pretty far out folks from all walks of life where I went to school (CU Boulder). I heard the same thing and more from the students there, and that was 20 years ago. I got a chuckle out of it at the time, but they were very serious about it.
In both ends of the spectrum, but particularly in radical feminists, theories are influenced by ideologies and politics, hurting society at large.
Recently, a feminist(president of a feminist university group) told me males were incomplete females(XY would be an incomplete version of XX) and, for that reason, they should have their instincts and behaviour suppressed.
Edit: As some have mentioned, the girl referred to the SCUM manifest http://www.womynkind.org/scum.htm