b1. businesses have a need for collaborative writing
b2. businesses are mired in their ms-word mindset
b3. businesses will pay for a tool they need...
b4. ...unless they can get it for free from google
b5. i don't care about businesses; thus ends this list
*
w1. i care about writers, individuals exercising creativity
w2. writers don't write collaboratively; editors can suck it
w3. writers certainly won't pay for a collaborative tool
w4. it's highly doubtful writers will pay for any tool...
w5. ...but most especially if they can get it for free
w6. writers won't even _use_ an over-engineered tool
w7. writers want the tool to just get out of the darn way
w8. writers are quite happy with a empty field to write in
w7. editorially was over-engineered, and is penflip too
w8. draft-in started just right, but is now over-engineered
w9. writers don't trust storing their stuff "somewhere else"
w10. version-tracking is great, but not the be-all, end-all
w11. github? order-of-magnitude over-engineered for writers
c1. communication is pervasive (facetime, hangouts, twitter)
c2. collaboration doesn't need to be built into every tool
c3. to the extent it is needed, use stuff like sugarbox.io
c4. javascript writing tools will be beer- and speech-free
c5. i can point to a dozen, and release my own next week
c6. so nobody is gonna build a business on writing tools
c7. html is so old-fashioned, with http://strapdownjs.com
b1. businesses have a need for collaborative writing
b2. businesses are mired in their ms-word mindset
b3. businesses will pay for a tool they need...
b4. ...unless they can get it for free from google
b5. i don't care about businesses; thus ends this list
*
w1. i care about writers, individuals exercising creativity
w2. writers don't write collaboratively; editors can suck it
w3. writers certainly won't pay for a collaborative tool
w4. it's highly doubtful writers will pay for any tool...
w5. ...but most especially if they can get it for free
w6. writers won't even _use_ an over-engineered tool
w7. writers want the tool to just get out of the darn way
w8. writers are quite happy with a empty field to write in
w7. editorially was over-engineered, and is penflip too
w8. draft-in started just right, but is now over-engineered
w9. writers don't trust storing their stuff "somewhere else"
w10. version-tracking is great, but not the be-all, end-all
w11. github? order-of-magnitude over-engineered for writers
*
c1. communication is pervasive (facetime, hangouts, twitter)
c2. collaboration doesn't need to be built into every tool
c3. to the extent it is needed, use stuff like sugarbox.io
c4. javascript writing tools will be beer- and speech-free
c5. i can point to a dozen, and release my own next week
c6. so nobody is gonna build a business on writing tools
c7. html is so old-fashioned, with http://strapdownjs.com