Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Especially after they committed textbook misconduct by trying to purge one of the paper authors because he worked for a competitor


That's not what happened, though.

They sugggested a cooperation with the other guy, using OpenAI's resources and OpenAI's solution of NS to work on and publish NS proof (that those other guys didn't have). Of course, OpenAI can decide whom to work with and that giving resources to their competitor's employee would be weird for both companies.


It is what happened. OpenAI offered to let Buckmaster publish first but only if Alpoge's name was removed.

No. Euler solution would have bith names, this was not up to debate. The discussion was about the solution for NS, which was solved by OpenAI, but not by B&A. OpenAI proposed B a cooperation on NS (were super-nice and threw him a bone, really) using OpenAI's findings and resources. It would be weird to have A, an Anthropic employee, as part of the OpenAI research and project.

It could be interpreted either way, I think.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: