Rather depends on the "spoils" capacity of the channel.

The windfall may not even justify the initial expenditure before it's exhausted.

I think spoiling a commons is risky for individuals, not so much for investors. Breaking a future law is lucrative

Jokes on them - they poison the commons enough, and soon no one is going to trust anything they read on the internet.

Which is how it should have been from the get-go.

What makes you think that is not the intention?

Exactly. It will be great for the rich and powerful when common people are drowning in so much mis- and disinformation that the only way to get through a day is to disbelieve everything. There will be even less accountability then.

It’s an information problem you can’t solve.

Unless you take a global census of every possible resource, as well as it’s replenishment rate, you can’t know how to rate limit it

All overconsumption is only recognized after the fact

It’s one of the most intractable problems in the universe