Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Microsoft is very much not FAANG. They’ve been trying to eliminate dedicated QA for years and underpay contractors.

Microsoft can afford to do a lot of things, but why when you can squeeze a bit more profit out.



I have never heard anyone ever utter the words, "Microsoft makes great products and services." They basically built an empire on brand recognition and vendor lock-in. Of course, a lot of their success was due to catching lightning in a bottle a few times at the right moments.

It is miraculous how they continue to fail upwards somehow. I suppose it's because they just vampirically sustain themselves by acquiring other companies and sucking them dry until they are a husk of what they once were -- like Github, Activision/Blizzard, LinkedIn, Skype, etc.. I remember when those companies used to actually produce good products and services.


It's because they understand capitalism better than they understand software. The former is how you win capitalism, the latter is just a cost center.

Same with Oracle. Both of them are good at getting contracts and then executing them not poorly enough that it's breach of contract but not well enough that the customer stops paying. That's their business, not software.


Vendor lock in is a hell of a drug.

Would you want to go and spend billions to migrate off Microsoft/Oracle when you could just not and get to the next quarter.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: