Recently saw a podcast about the rise of "AI midwits". The guy's point was that it's good to become a midwit, because it's a stage between knowing nothing and knowing a lot, but an AI midwit just has the aesthetics of a midwit and none of the actual knowledge and is stuck there.
But I don't remember how he defined a midwit, because podcasts are a terrible way to convey knowledge. It might've been something like someone who acts like they know everything.
But I don't remember how he defined a midwit, because podcasts are a terrible way to convey knowledge. It might've been something like someone who acts like they know everything.