Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Oh. Thanks for setting me straight on the cheeseshop (I actually thinking that since it has its own package management system, it would have its own cheeseshop) Sorry.

As for complexity, I still think it's excessive. It's good to know the internals of a module/package/whatever, and django is really really complex, of which cyclomatic complexity quantifies I believe. I mean, if you have code that branches off everywhere, it'd be hard to follow the logic when inspecting the internals.



So Django doesn't have its own package management system, either.

I'm curious: where did you read/see that?


Maybe the 'django [reusable] app' terminology?

One of the first few pages in the tutorial includes:

"Django apps are "pluggable": You can use an app in multiple projects, and you can distribute apps, because they don't have to be tied to a given Django installation."

and I guess it might be possible to mistake 'manage.py startapp ...' as some sort of internal packaging thing if you don't look too deeply.


Yah. Obviously I was mistaken. But your points exactly


Holy ... jacobian replied me.

To answer your question: I am an idiot and I didn't know much about Django. I did once find djangopackages or something like that and simply jumped to the conclusion. Big and Unwieldly is the brand perception I had.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: