Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I highly recommend people watch video from the trial--specifically the officer testimonies. It's absurd this lawsuit was even fit for trial.


The bits I watched were so captivating I had to take them off, otherwise I wouldn't be getting anything done this afternoon.

Honestly, someone could adapt it to a script and run it in a live theater.

Now I know what I'm watching tonight!


Do you have a link? There are plenty of snippets that are easy to find, is there one canonical full video?



With some strange commentary, ended up watching https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ozZIWy7OWk from that playlist and I'm not sure it's AI or what's going on, at one point she said Afroman called one of the police officers a "PDF" which is the first time I heard, doesn't seem Afroman actually said something like that, and I also don't understand at all what's that's supposed to mean. Doesn't seem to be a typo either?


"PDF" is a zoomer euphemism for "pedophile".


Funnily, this started because their trying to avoid perceived insta shadow banning.


Yes, this sort of thing has been a plague against the English language for a few years now, responsible for such ugly constructions as "to unalive".

(I understand and respect the linguists who would maintain a descriptivist view of this sort of thing, but I'm not a linguist and I'm not required to suspend my aesthetic opinions whenever an ugly fashion rears its head.)


> It's absurd this lawsuit was even fit for trial

Is it just me or did the judge seemed biased towards the cops? He also dismissed Afroman's counter-suit.


Unfortunately, cops have the right to break down your door if the warrant warrants it--like having a sex dungeon.


"..raid my house and then get pissed, because the dungeon don't exist.."

Bars.

That guy is like a court jester of old unleashed onto an unsuspecting, (and corrupt), 21st century steward class.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: