Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think the "squirrel!" behavior has to do with getting revenue in the door.

I'm not following extremely close, but it seems like Mozilla is chasing what can be turned into a product. Things that involve setting up a monthly subscription, whether it's VPNs, keeping your name out of certain tracking databases, etc.

I wonder how Mozilla used to be funded vs how it's now funded?

The web is a better place with a non-profit-driven group like Mozilla in it... but is Mozilla Corporation becoming more money-driven than it used to be, even if it can't turn a profit? Or can it turn a profit, because it's not the Mozilla Foundation [1]?

1. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/foundation/moco/



Or is that backwards? Revenue comes in the door, and we must spend it, because empires must be built. No longer 100 developers working on a browser, but thousands working on all sorts of unrelated things and all the support staff. Whereas the alternative would be staying small and focused, sticking that money in the bank, and become financially independent. A new CEO could even do that. Conservatively invest one year's 600M revenue, rake off 20M per year, and the nestegg would still grow with inflation. And that is enough to develop a web browser provided you don't do it in silicon valley. Two or three years revenue and you can even market it.

I think we see this a lot, with companies pulling in too much money from IPOs or venture capital, pissing it away on unfocused growth, and if they are lucky back where they started. Or unlucky and bankrupt.


Mozilla Corp is allowed to turn a profit. Distributions of that profit are the primary source of funding for the Mozilla Foudnation.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: