You can't list these apps, say they're scam or they don't work with no proof whatsoever except your word, especially when there's counter arguments they actually work.
Explain yourself, or are we supposed to take your word for gospel?
> Explain yourself, or are we supposed to take your word for gospel?
Not gonna waste more time on this tbh, as I'm building a competition to those products. If you don't believe me, stay in your walled garden. I've given you hints, start checking them for yourself or don't.
If I would post screenshots of MITMProxy, Little Snitch or something else, people would try to discredit them as fake anyways.
> If you don't believe me, stay in your walled garden. I've given you hints, start checking them for yourself or don't.
There's no need to be so confrontational. You made the claim, you'll probably be asked to show the technical reasoning behind your statements on a forum called Hacker News. But since you're working on competition, it's in your best interest to discredit similar products.
> If I would post screenshots of MITMProxy, Little Snitch or something else, people would try to discredit them as fake anyways
Sounds to me you're not prepared for people to show you might be incorrect. Honestly, I never doubted your position, I just wanted clarification for my own intellectual gratification. But you sound really defensive for some reason.
(By the way, I do not work in ad-tech nor in ad-blocking tech and I have no stake in anything slightly related to the matter at hand.)
Explain yourself, or are we supposed to take your word for gospel?