A basic thing to understand about electricity storage is that there are very different needs for different kinds of storage.
Flywheels from what I understand are for very shortterm storage needs, i.e. balancing out shortterm fluctuations in electricity use vs. generation. But they're unsuitable for any kind of longterm storage, because they loose power over time.
In the long run with a high-solar-high-wind-scenario we'll need some seasonal storage to get us over a couple of weeks in some circumstances. This will need some storage that doesn't loose power over time.
(FWIW I have no idea if these gravitational storage techs will play any role in that, and one can be doubtful about it.)
Apparently not that easily or the half-life would be longer than two hours... You want to try if storing energy in a flywheel while using a lot of energy for the magnetic field can outperform gravity storage?
You would need to supply a lot of power just to maintain a vacuum and levitating your flywheel. Not sure this solution would be very effective. Maybe with superconductors, but then cooling is your problem instead.
I know Pennsylvania and New York both have 20 MW storage systems that takes up a few acres and are relatively cheap per unit of storage.