File metadata wasn't my concern. Spreading baseless rumors without concern for grieving family and friends makes Sparkling (and his buddies) grade-A fuckwads in my book.
which is verifiable with google's 2048-bit dkim key.
I am sorry that the subject is sore, but that is not a reason to accept a contrived government narrative or dismiss any otherwise postulation or, in this case, theoretical supposition as conspiracy theory.
I would say that's kind of the point, the manner in which that opinions is expressed aside. There isn't evidence in either direction that's been released to the public. So why respond to a comment with more conjecture?
Where exactly am i spreading rumors? I am pointing out what Assange said in two interviews and linked the source. Whether or not you belive Assange is up to you.
